[FoCHAT] CHAT: Please attend: 6:30 PM Wed,
and next LRA Bd. Meeting to help reverse the RHP Backward Motion!
Melanie Ehrlich
mehrlich8 at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 3 11:41:12 PDT 2007
Dear CHAT and FoCHAT Members,
Our next weekly Wed. meeting (tomorrow, 6:30 PM) will be at my house at 1450 Crescent Dr., opposite the new site of Holy Cross Sch. and the old site of Redeemer HS, between Paris and St. Bernard. I live in a post-K 10 ft elevated house, pink with blue trim right past Cartier St. We are having the meeting at my house because UNO came up with a new rule to give $50 tickets to anyone parked in their free lots, even for a public event which has been scheduled and about which we remind the UNO police every Wed. afternoon.
All are invited (whether a member of CHAT, FoCHAT, or a prospective member) to the Wed. meeting at my house. Please come if you are available, in the metropolitan area now, and bothered (or livid) upon reading the two articles below and the other inexcusable news about stoppages of processing RHP grants and loans.
In addition, we urge those of you who can attend the next LRA Bd. Meeting (see immediately below) to do so and help us by speaking out as a CHAT member for the 3 min allotted per member of the public at the end of the meeting. You need not attend the whole meeting. If you can do that and try to help us make a big difference in the Road Home Program, please write to chatlra at yahoo.com and put LRA Mtg. in the subject and all your contact details in the text. We will coordinate the presentations. This upcoming meeting will be discussed at the Wed. evening meeting at my house.
Melanie Ehrlich
The UPCOMING LRA BOARD MEETING TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE CHAT MEETING AT MY HOUSE ON WED. at 6:30 PM
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Event: LRA Board of Directors meeting
Time: 9:00 am 3:30 pm
House Committee Room 1
State Capitol, Baton Rouge, La.
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-8/117549264173650.xml&coll=1
Road Home faces detour
Lenders want to keep installment option
Monday, April 02, 2007
By David Hammer
Staff writer
If the state's mortgage lenders have their way, the recent federal rebuke of Louisiana's Road Home program won't change the way most of the rebuilding grant applicants get their money: slowly, in installments tied to the completion of renovations.
Advertisement
The federal department of Housing and Urban Development recently ruled that the rebuilding and buyout program for flood-damaged homes violated federal rules by mandating the installments without submitting to the costly environmental and labor reviews that must take place with all federal rehabilitation programs.
The alternative is a direct compensation program in which homeowners with mortgages must work out payment schedules with any lenders that share a claim to the money, as Mississippi has done.
For the past two weeks, state and federal negotiators have been trying to work through a compromise. On Friday, the state ordered the Road Home program to temporarily stop sending out award letters until it figures out a new payment policy, Road Home spokeswoman Gentry Brann said.
The state is leaving all options open, including a plan endorsed by the New Orleans faith-based organization The Jeremiah Group in which grant checks for mortgaged properties would be made out to the homeowner and the lender jointly. In this scheme, borrowers would have a choice: take a lump sum to spend as they wish, except their lender would have the power to take it for mortgage payments; or, take installments as repair work is completed, without lenders laying claim to the money.
The Rev. Walter Baer, pastor of Grace Episcopal Church, said the group is worried the state will push for lump-sum awards so the money will be out of its hands and homeowners will be stuck battling the banks over how to use it.
"The proposal we are supporting assures that homeowners have a choice in how to receive their awards, that they receive an incentive to rebuild and that they are protected from having mortgage companies seize their Road Home grants," Baer said.
The state's mortgage bankers, who want to ensure that homes are rebuilt to back their loans and protect neighboring property values, don't like the lump-sum option either, and appear to be digging in their heels to fight for grants paid in installments as work is done.
"We still think it will come down to disbursement accounts," said Francis Creighton, senior director of government affairs for the national Mortgage Bankers Association. "It's the only way."
Too soon to tell
That association, along with the Louisiana Bankers Association and Fannie Mae, met in Washington through the weekend, looking for the best way to preserve the existing installment rules. Currently, homeowners can get only $7,500 in their first grant installment, and receive the rest of the money in thirds as they prove they have completed repairs. Louisiana officials had expected to send a new agreement with the lenders to federal housing officials by the end of this week, but the lending community still has some concerns.
That means the 80 percent of southern Louisiana homeowners with active mortgages might have rejoiced too soon two weeks ago, when a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development decision seemed to hasten a switch from a controlled disbursement of Road Home grant awards to lump-sum payments.
Two weeks ago -- nine months into the homeowner grant program -- HUD officials informed the state it would have to change its grant disbursement methods or submit to onerous environmental and labor reviews on tens of thousands of properties. Under the current mandated installments, the state violated the rules for so-called "compensation" programs, which aim to make grant recipients whole, with few strings. Federal officials determined that Louisiana's effort to control the rebuilding decisions of homeowners with the mandated installment plan made the Road Home a "rebuilding" program, thus subject to a whole slew of extra rules.
Lenders' worries
To avoid the expensive, time-consuming reviews, the state chose last week to make direct compensation grants available to homeowners without mortgages, starting in April. But the lenders say a similar program for mortgaged properties will not fly.
The lenders, larger banks in particular, say they aren't too worried about protecting individual mortgage investments. A part of every mortgage agreement covers miscellaneous proceeds, which includes the Road Home grant money, giving lenders legal control over the disbursement of the money, up to the amount of a homeowner's mortgage debt.
But lenders have no say over grant money covering homeowners' equity, and no power whatsoever over properties without mortgages. Still, mortgage or not, the lenders are worried that any up-front, lump-sum grant payments will be an open invitation for homeowners to use the money for other things, leading to rampant blight that drives down property values for everyone -- including those neighbors who are responsible enough to rebuild.
"This can cause a 100 percent increase in blight, and we already have a blight problem as it is," said Alden McDonald, president of Liberty Bank and a participant in some of the lenders' continuing negotiations.
Now that lump-sum payments are approved for nonmortgaged properties and Chase Bank in Columbus, Ohio, will no longer disburse such grants, only a tough-to-enforce covenant prevents about one in five Road Home applicants from taking the money and leaving their properties to rot. The state would have to wait at least three years to see whether a good-faith effort was made to repair and reside in the home before suing to recover the grant money.
Confusion, frustration
With half of New Orleans' pre-Katrina population gone, the city almost certainly will end up with a huge inventory of vacant housing, even after the state hands out the $7.5 billion in Road Home money. If the Road Home becomes a pure compensation program -- and cannot ensure a certain amount of rebuilding -- the area will lose even more, McDonald said.
"You want a banking community that feels good about investing here," he said. "This change in HUD policy is changing the dynamics for rebuilding. It's frustrating, but it's also an opportunity to set a clear housing policy."
Like McDonald, the national mortgage association can't understand why HUD has stepped in now after months of careful review of the lender-state agreements. Several lenders signed pacts with the state last year agreeing not to snatch their clients' Road Home grants to pay off mortgages, so long as they could arrange for the homeowners to collect the money as they complete restoration work.
State and industry leaders say they thought HUD had signed off on the wording of those agreements, so the Road Home was cleared as a compensation program, not a forced rehabilitation program.
"We thought HUD had it right the first time," Creighton said.
HUD has said it simply stepped in as soon as it had a chance to actually see how the grants were being disbursed, and that the state's practice did not match its federally approved plan.
If, as expected, the state gets an agreement from lenders and sends Road Home program changes to HUD, lawyers for the state and the lenders will have to craft language carefully so the state is encouraging -- but not forcing -- homeowners to use all of their grant money to rebuild.
. . . . . . .
David Hammer can be reached at dhammer at timespicayune.com or (504) 826-3322
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/metro/index.ssf?/base/news-20/11755807139050.xml&coll=1
Audit finds uneven Road
Counselors give out inconsistent info
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
By David Hammer
Staff writer
A state audit has found the counselors at Road Home housing centers often don't have formal procedures and give out inconsistent information when they meet with homeowners who have applied for the hurricane recovery aid.
The office of Legislative Auditor Steve J. Theriot reviewed operations at six of the Road Home's 12 permanent housing assistance centers, where applicants come to hold initial, and sometimes follow-up, interviews.
The interviewers aim to help homeowners start the application process and organize documentation they need to establish what they lost in Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. But auditors who observed these meetings found the program's 255 housing advisers rarely provided applicants with the same types of information.
The auditors observed interviews in New Orleans, Metairie, Lake Charles, Baton Rouge, and St. Bernard and Vermilion parishes. In as many as a third of those sessions, Road Home staff failed to address critical details about eligibility, program options or requirements of the covenant applicants would be signing if they planned to rebuild, the audit report said.
Most of the problems stem from a lack of formal performance measurements, and in some cases, managers reviewed their employees' work, but left no written quality-control record. The state Office of Community Development, which oversees Road Home contractor ICF International, agreed with the audit's criticisms and promised to demand formal policies from the company.
ICF, which stands to make as much as $756 million running Gov. Kathleen Blanco's Road Home program, already has had the April 1 deadline for setting those policies pushed back by a few days, company spokeswoman Gentry Brann said. The delay, she said, stems from current efforts to change the program's payout methods, a significant detour spurred by a recent ruling from federal housing officials.
Further delayed
The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development two weeks ago ruled that the program's way of paying out grants in installments as home repairs are done would trigger extensive and expensive environmental and labor reviews unless the state changed the policy. That sudden news, nine months into Louisiana's $7.5 billion aid program for homeowners, sent state officials scrambling to alter the process and forced more delays.
Beyond delaying ICF's ability to respond to the legislative audit, the Road Home temporarily stopped sending applicants their award letters while state officials and lending institutions try to work out a new payment method. The letters had to be put on hold, Brann said, because they contain information about how money will be paid out after closing -- information that soon could be out of date.
Also postponed was a final agreement between the state and ICF to include contractual deadlines for moving applicants through the process, along with penalties on the company for failing to meet those goals.
Community development officials said they finally had reached an agreement on the formal goals two weeks ago and the new contract language was on Blanco's desk March 16, awaiting the governor's signature. But that's where it stayed after HUD dropped a bombshell that appears to be leading to significant changes in the way homeowners get their grants.
'More than a nuance'
HUD's ruling had a direct effect on slowing down a process that the state thought was just starting to pick up steam, said Sam Jones, who has kept track of the Road Home program for Blanco's office.
"Any time you make a change, even a nuance, there's a minimum of two weeks of retooling," Jones said. "And this is more than a nuance. On a major change like this, sometimes you have to go through a month of changes. That's why we were so bitter on that Friday when HUD gave us the news."
As of the end of business Friday, 5,444 applicants, or 4.5 percent of the 120,680, had held their grant closings. That represented a significant increase from the end of January. It also means the program completed about 2,700 closings in March, less than half of the 6,200 closings the state had set as a goal for the month.
. . . . . . .
David Hammer can be reached at dhammer at timespicayune.com or (504) 826-3322.
Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Christopher Tidmore" <christophertidmore at yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more
Subject: Tidmore's Stories: ICF: "We're A Year Ahead
To: "Christopher Tidmore" <christophertidmore at clearchannel.com>
CC: "Donaldsonville Chief" <dvillechief at bellsouth.net>, "Melanie Ehrlich" <mehrlich8 at yahoo.com>, "Jim Engster" <jim at wrkf.org>, "Amy Erwin" <amy at kkay1590.com>, "Les Evenchick" <piratefish at yahoo.com>
ICF: "We're A Year Ahead of Schedule"
By Christopher Tidmore, www.thenew995fm.com
When asked if ICF had credibility with the people of
Louisiana, company spokesperson Gentry Brann replied
to Rob Couhig on 99.5 FM's morning show, "I believe
they do". She added that ICF was a year ahead of the
original schedule the state laid out.
Couhig then narrowed his questioning to the recent
history of the company.
ICF held an IPO to become a public company on
September 27, 2006. It then signed the contract with
the State of Louisiana on October 19, 2006. A company
that had never had more than $182 million dollars in
business was able to make a stock offering boasting of
a $756 million contract. In the original press release
for the IPO, ICF boasted of the Housing Program
Management Contract with Louisiana's Office of
Community Development to demonstrate the financial
viability of the firm.
Questions have arisen in recent months if the timing
of the IPO, which by all appearances was formally
scheduled right before ICF's deal with the state was
closed, could have resulted because of insider
information on the Road Home contract that the firm
might have had.
There was no connection, the Spokesperson said. Brann
defended timing of ICF's stock offering, claiming that
there was nothing secret about that decision. "It had
been in process for a year before," she said. "It was
set up a year in advance of us signing the contract,"
well before the Road Home management contract even had
a Request for Proposals.
Addressing the slowness of the award process, Brann
maintained, "No one is blaming anyone. The people of
Louisiana are part of this process, and it is in all
of our interest to get everyone their awards as
quickly as we can."
"We have been seeing record number of closings every
day."
Some may see the amount in the award award letter
change. Under federal law, she said, there cannot be a
duplication of claims. That is causing many homeowners
to contest their amounts, delaying the award process,
she claimed.
However, responding to the Legislative Auditor's
Report, that found massive failures in the operation
of ICF, she replied, "We're still reviewing the
auditors report."
"We are going through it with a fine tooth comb, and
we are in the process of preparing our response to the
state." She disagreed with the claim by the
legislative auditor, though, that managers make no
written reports on the work of various employees.
"We aggressively train our housing advisors," she
stated.
Brann said many of the problems have already been
examined and improved previously. ICF gets audited all
the time. "This is sort of business as usual for
us...We always welcome audits." The company learns
from them, she said. "We have seen many changes in the
program," since the problems of the audit. "We work
really quickly to apply those learnings. And, I think
that in this one in particular, the things that they
addressed were things that have gone back a long way
in the program that have already been addressed or we
have systems in place to quickly address very specific
issues."
"Today, as I sit here, we are anticipating significant
changes."
"There have been frustrations. There have been things
that have gone wrong with the program," but Brann said
that ICF is working to improve performance.
But a caller still could not understand why the total
closing numbers were so low after almost a year. In
her personal case, she was ready to close, had no
objections with the award amount, yet seemed blocked
at every turn. Brann replied, "Just because you are
ready to go closing doesn't mean all the documents are
ready."
ICF has to do a full title search for all closings.
However, Brann did say is that ICF reps should be able
to give an caller an update of his or her status. The
caller retorted that everytime recently that she asked
for such an update, the ICF reps responded that they
cannot tell her status "because there was a glitch in
your paperwork".
"We would have to find out," Brann said, the nature of
the caller's individual problem.
Nor did Brann claim any responsibility for ICF from
the HUD's "memorandum of understanding" which demands
block payments or an expensive regime of environmental
study before awards can be spent on reconstruction--a
provision for which the Louisiana supposedly received
a waver. Brann said that state negotiated that deal.
Still, Couhig interjected as the interview came to a
close, how did a company that had a market value of
$182 million, how did it get a better than a 760
million dollar contract? "I have to tell you," she
said, "ICF is one of 23 companies that make the Road
Home program," most of the money goes to
infrastructure, other firms, and the over 2000
employees who were hired in Louisiana--better than 80%
natives of the state.
Couhig said, though, that the President of ICF bragged
that the profits were substantially higher than any
previous year in their corporate report. That was one
of the reasons they were able to go public, the
President reportedly claimed--according to the 99.5
morning show host.
Brann replied that the company's other contracts
contributed to the success of the company.
She also added that starting next week, a new "Road
Home Advisory Program" premiers.
"It's an optional program for people who want to come
in and have a second or third appointment with an
advisor," Brann explained. This will allow people to
check the status of their applications, the recovery
status of their neighborhoods, and other rebuilding
information. "It's like having a caseworker."
Still, Brann could not promise outright that an
advisor will now stay with a homeowner throughout the
award process. For more information, call
1-800-ROAD2LA.
The Spokesperson bragged there have been 46,000
letters sent, but admitted that only 6000 awards have
fully closed. She noted that ICF was aiming for
"another 18,000 closings" to happen within a few
weeks, but she would not give a specific date. The
goal is 8,000 for April, yet she warned that the
recent "technicalities" could delay reaching that
threshold.
It was ICF's position, she maintained, that "we are a
year ahead of our original schedule that the state
laid out."
TO HEAR BRANN VOICE THAT CLAIM CLICK HERE FOR
NEWSMAKER ON DEMAND.
http://www.thenew995fm.com/cc-common/podcast.html
---------------------------------
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.thinknola.com/pipermail/fochat/attachments/20070403/6726a76d/attachment.html
More information about the FoCHAT
mailing list